Close

SeeSALT Blog

Updated:

California Lawyers Association Tax Policy Seminar

Pillsbury SALT partner Robert P. Merten III will present at a tax policy seminar hosted by the California Lawyers Association on October 18. Robert will be presenting on the topic, “California’s Approach to the Multistate Tax Base.” This program will examine California’s approach to determining the multistate tax base, including…

Updated:

Arizona Court Shines (Sun)Light on Property Tax Treatment of ITCs

The Arizona Court of Appeals held that an investment tax credit (ITC) deferred as a tax asset has “value” and therefore is properly excluded from the taxable original cost of renewable energy equipment for Arizona property tax purposes.  In so holding, the court rejected the argument that an ITC has…

Updated:

Pillsbury SALT Team Together in California for COST Tech

The Pillsbury SALT team had an incredible time last month at the COST SALT Workshop for Technology Companies in Cupertino, CA.  Carley Roberts, Zachary Atkins, Craig Becker, Evan Hamme, Robert P. Merten III, Jeffrey Vesely, and Aruna Chittiappa were all panelists and presented on various topics at the workshop. The…

Updated:

Technology Transfer Agreements: Latest Developments in California

In 1993, the California Legislature amended Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) sections 6011 and 6012 to exclude from California sales and use tax amounts charged for intangible personal property transferred with a technology transfer agreement (TTA) if the TTA separately stated a reasonable price for the tangible personal property (TPP). Nine…

Updated:

COST’s 2024 Annual Meeting

Pillsbury SALT attorneys Evan Hamme and Aruna Chittiappa will present during COST’s Annual Meeting on September 25 and 26. Evan Hamme: The Impact of Loper Bright on State Tax Authority and Taxpayer Deference Wednesday, September 25, 11:10 am – 12:00 pm The Loper Bright decision overruled the landmark Chevron doctrine, which had provided a framework for…

Updated:

Carveouts Count! Taxpayer Wins New Mexico Statutory Carveout Issue Regarding Unity

The New Mexico Court of Appeals has held that a multinational oil and gas production company did not constitute a “unitary corporation” with its foreign subsidiaries, pursuant to statutory carve-out language regarding the term “unitary corporation.” Taxpayer Apache Corporation’s (Taxpayer) foreign subsidiaries issued dividends, generated Subpart F income, or otherwise…