Close

Articles Posted in California

Updated:

California Supreme Court Expands the California Real Estate Transfer Tax to Entity Transfers that Cause Property Tax Re-Assessments under Proposition 13

State and local real estate transfer taxes have become larger planning concerns for investors in U.S. real property, particularly in gateway cities like New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco. This article by colleagues Craig A. Becker, Richard E. Nielsen, Breann E. Robowski and  Andrew J. Weiner describes a recent expansion…

Updated:

Many Questions Unanswered After California’s Tax Shakeup

(This article originally was published by Law360 on October 7, 2017.) On Sept. 16, 2017, California Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill (A.B.) 131 into law,[1] which takes effect immediately and makes various changes to the Taxpayer Transparency and Fairness Act of 2017 enacted on June 27, 2017.[2] The Act…

Updated:

Blazing a Trail for More Local Taxes by Ballot Initiative

(This article originally was published by Law360 on September 7, 2017.) On Aug. 28, 2017, in California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, the California Supreme Court held local taxes imposed by taxpayers via initiative are subject to less stringent requirements than taxes imposed by local governments pursuant to Proposition…

Updated:

California Supreme Court Decision Changes the Transfer Tax World

TAKEAWAYS The California Supreme Court’s Ardmore decision concludes counties and cities are permitted to impose transfer tax on entity transfers that result in R&TC §§ 64(c) or 64(d) changes in ownership. Litigation over how to implement this taxation is a certainty. In 926 North Ardmore Avenue LLC v. County of…

Updated:

Imposing Documentary Transfer Taxes in California After Ardmore

(This article originally was published by Law360 on July 7, 2016.) Rarely does a subject as mundane as a documentary transfer tax become worthy of its own article. However, the June 29, 2017, decision of the California Supreme Court in 926 North Ardmore Avenue LLC v. County of Los Angeles…

Updated:

Taxes, Fees and “Something Else”: California’s Morning Star Decision

On April 6, the Third District California Court of Appeal decided Morning Star Packing Company v. California Air Resources Board, a case that challenged California’s cap-and-trade auction process as an unconstitutional tax because it was not enacted by two-thirds majorities in both chambers of the State Legislature, as required for…

Updated:

California Legislative Committee Holds Informational Hearing on Lucent and Administering California’s Technology Transfer Agreement Law

On January 30, 2017, the California Legislature Assembly Committee on Revenue and Taxation held an informational hearing on “Life after Lucent: Administering California’s Technology Transfer Agreement Law.” The California State Board of Equalization (SBE) and the Board’s staff are currently wrestling with the meaning of the Technology Transfer Act (TTA)…

Updated:

Nortel, Lucent and Taxing Embedded Software in California Under a Technology Transfer Agreement

As consumer products become more high tech, the line between computers and traditional devices has blurred. Even basic products, such as toothbrushes, alarm clocks, doorbells, smartphones, cameras, home security systems, printers and copiers now include technical software that enables new functionality options for the device. As a general principle, tangible…

Updated:

Quick Points – Property Taxation and Software in California

(This article originally was published in Vol. 25, No. 4 of the California Lawyers Association’s California Tax Lawyer.) Section 995 and 995.2 of the California Revenue & Taxation Code exempt all software except for basic operational programs from property taxation. Basic input output systems, known as BIOS, draw the line…