SALT attorneys Zachary Atkins, Aruna Chittiappa, Evan Hamme, Jeff Phang, Nolan Kessler and Breanna Zagorski will present live at COST’s SALT Webinar on August 11.

SALT attorneys Zachary Atkins, Aruna Chittiappa, Evan Hamme, Jeff Phang, Nolan Kessler and Breanna Zagorski will present live at COST’s SALT Webinar on August 11.


The New Mexico Court of Appeals has held that a multinational oil and gas production company did not constitute a “unitary corporation” with its foreign subsidiaries, pursuant to statutory carve-out language regarding the term “unitary corporation.”

A New Mexico Hearing Officer found that Gross Receipts Tax does not apply to a taxpayer’s markup for services performed outside New Mexico, but the taxpayer’s reimbursements for payroll to New Mexico employees are taxable New Mexico receipts. In Protest of Talbridge, the taxpayer was a Texas employment agency with no offices in New Mexico that was the legal employer of individuals providing services to a client in New Mexico. The client recruited and interviewed candidates and, if hired, provided the employee a list from which to select their desired payroll provider. If the employee chose the taxpayer, the taxpayer charged the client the payroll expense plus a percentage (“markup”) as compensation for its services.