Recent Ohio Supreme Court decisions addressing the situsing of receipts under the Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) underscore both the limits of the “continuous delivery theory” and the evidentiary hurdles taxpayers face when seeking refunds for transactions involving Ohio distribution centers.
Read together, VVF Intervest, L.L.C. v. Harris, Slip Op. No. 2025-Ohio-5680 (Ohio Dec. 24, 2025), and Jones Apparel Group/Nine West Holdings v. Harris, Slip Op. No. 2026-Ohio-74 (Ohio Jan. 14, 2026), confirm a transaction-focused approach to CAT situsing while highlighting the evidentiary showing required to substantiate refund claims.
Articles Posted in Ohio
Got Remote Workers? Supreme Court of Ohio Upholds Pandemic Rule for Municipality Tax

The Supreme Court of Ohio has held the Ohio legislature did not violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution by directing an Ohio citizen to pay taxes to the municipality where the employee’s principal place of work was located rather than to where the employee actually worked.
Second Place Is Just the First Place Loser: Ohio Supreme Court Rejects State’s Sourcing of NASCAR Intangible Receipts to Ohio
In a much-anticipated decision concerning the situsing of receipts from intangibles for Ohio commercial activity tax (CAT) purposes, the Ohio Supreme Court rejected the Ohio Department of Taxation’s
attempt to situs NASCAR Holdings, Inc.’s broadcast revenue, media revenue, licensing fees, and sponsorship fees to Ohio. The court’s opinion in NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. McClain, Slip Op. No. 2022-Ohio-4131 (Nov. 22, 2022), confirms that under Ohio law receipts based on the right to use intellectual property may be sitused to Ohio only if the receipts, i.e., the underlying payments, are tied to a specific right to use the property in Ohio. Continue Reading ›
SeeSALT Blog

